web analytics

Make Redford Pay

Redford will meet today with global financial and political leaders in an elite and secretive gathering. This year’s Bilderberg meeting is in Chantilly, Va. and will reportedly cost the tax payers of Alberta $19,000.
This is the arrogance that is Ms. Redford. This disrespect she has for the tax payers of Alberta is appalling as she treats the public purse as her own personal piggy bank to further her own agenda and career.
Participants attend Bilderberg in a private
and not an official capacity
The preceding statement is taken directly from the Bilderberg Meeting’s own website, third paragraph last sentence.
Ms. Redford has chosen the ”private, invite-only”Bilderberg conference over federal NDP Leader Tom Mulcair’s visit to the Oilsands today. The conference will not and can not bear fruit due to the restrictions laid out by the Bilderberg organization which prohibits disclosing the contents of the discussions that take place during the meetings.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday before leaving on her four-day trip, Redford said she won’t keep secret what issues were discussed, yet this is in contradiction to the Bilderberg’s own conditions of involvement.
By all accounts this group of financial elitists are doing nothing more than social engineering. Does this sound familiar?
Take the time to sign one of the petitions below, online or through your Facebook account to let Ms. Redford know that we the tax payers will not stand for her using our money for a meeting that has no benefit to the people of Alberta.
POSTED BY AT 10:18 AM

Platform, Bozos and Rogues.

In the previous entries in this series, I have discussed how the Wildrose Party neglected Edmonton to the detriment of winning northern Alberta seats and how the issue of conscience rights and statements made by one candidate in particular were the deciding factors in the Wildrose loss on election day.

In this entry it is time to examine a few elements of the party’s platform and the how the bozo affect came into play.

Read on »

In part one of this series I looked at the effect the media had on Edmonton’s skewed view of the relationship between a Wildrose government and the municipality. Arguably, that may have had more of a negative affect on the Wildrose Party than did the issues about to be raised.

So what affect did the Wildrose Party’s statements on conscience rights and a candidate’s personal religious beliefs have on the outcome of the election?  As one failed candidate stated:

Read on »

Monday morning, April 23, 2012, I woke up excited and ready to face Alberta Election 2012.

Since Monday night I have been racking my brain, trying to get a handle on just what went wrong, at the last minute, and cast the Wildrose Party into official opposition status and not into power as the next Government of Alberta? I have come to the conclusion that while so much went wrong, campaign wise, the outcome was exactly what most of us had expected as close to the election as 2 weeks before the writ was dropped on March 28th, 2012. While speaking with party insiders, the idea of Wildrose receiving between 15 and 25 seats was pretty much the consensus on the outcome. Therefore winning 17 seats was not unexpected, except…..

Read on »